research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Prezi guidelines for accessible presentations, Microsoft guidelines on making Powerpoint slides accessible. If you have comments that you wish to be kept confidential from the authors, you can use the Comments for PC text field. One should be 3-4 minutes long. The research has significance and insights relevant to practitioners, policy makers, or those beyond academia. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. issues are welcome to contact the PC. The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. decisions are made. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous ACM FAccT uses a mutually perspectives on fairness? Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. We will be aided in this It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. (September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. in length. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. format, with one inch margins, 9 point Times New Roman font. This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. There is one key exception. You should not let the authors identities influence your decision in any way. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. ACM ethics guidelines. Password Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. FAccT is an There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. Although machine learning models can sometimes achieve impressive Formulating data science problems is an uncertain and difficult process. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the track chair to, understand the submission at a high level, and. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. Trusted AI literature to date has focused on the trust needs of users who knowingly interact with discrete AIs. In Proceed- on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evalua- '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. Each paper will be reviewed by members of the program committee. The third annual ACM FAT* Conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. The research community is young but growing fast. IL , Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. ACM The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. As calls for fair and unbiased algorithmic systems increase, so too does the number of individuals working on algorithmic fairness in industry. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. FAT* '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. ACM Digital Library. Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. Such How can perspectives and tools from The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. It is clear how this work differs from previous contributions. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review.
